Who ranks #1 on the LiveCodeBench leaderboard?
As of August 31, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek ranks #1 on LiveCodeBench at 93.5%. API pricing is $1.74/M input and $3.48/M output.
As of August 31, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is #1 for LiveCodeBench at 93.5%. Ranked by LiveCodeBench: contest programming on problems released after training. LiveCodeBench leaderboard for contamination-resistant coding scores, plus API pricing. Rank LLMs on fresh programming problems.
137 models. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price โ a dot under it is a worse deal than something on the line.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
The index
345 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab โ every model page stays linked here.









As of August 31, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek is #1 for LiveCodeBench at 93.5%. Ranked by LiveCodeBench: contest programming on problems released after training. This board also tracks LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench v6, Alder Polyglot. Next on the same board: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max and Claude Fable 5. Related leaders: MiniCPM-SALA on HumanEval at 95.1%; Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveCodeBench v6 at 91.9%. This livecodebench leaderboard ranks models by LiveCodeBench. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.
Sources: LiveCodeBench (https://livecodebench.github.io/); OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)
| Rank | Model | LiveCodeBench | Input /M | Output /M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max | 93.5% | $1.74 | $3.48 |
| 2 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max | 91.6% | $0.14 | $0.28 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5 | 89.8% | $10.00 | $50.00 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5 | 89.0% | $5.00 | $25.00 |
| 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | 88.7% | $0.75 | $3.75 |
| 6 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 88.5% | $2.50 | $15.00 |
| 7 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 | 88.4% | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| 8 | Grok 4.6 | 88.2% | $2.00 | $6.00 |
Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.
As of August 31, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek ranks #1 on LiveCodeBench at 93.5%. API pricing is $1.74/M input and $3.48/M output.
The current LiveCodeBench ranking as of August 31, 2026 is 1. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max at 93.5%; 2. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max at 91.6%; 3. Claude Fable 5 at 89.8%.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is the cheapest scored model on this livecodebench leaderboard at $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output ($0.06 blended). DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max still leads LiveCodeBench at 93.5%.
Not automatically. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads LiveCodeBench, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh LiveCodeBench against input/output price, context window, and related evals.
Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 31, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.
LiveCodeBench scores models on new competitive-programming problems released after training cutoffs, which reduces memorization compared with HumanEval.
LiveCodeBench is contest-style code. SWE-bench is multi-file GitHub repair. Use LiveCodeBench for algorithms, SWE-bench for product engineering.
HumanEval is older and more saturated, but still widely cited. Seeing both columns makes it obvious when a model only looks strong on the easy set.